Ray J is opening up about the painful reality of missing his son’s birthday and not spending the holiday with his children. The “One Wish” singer and reality TV star is currently unable to have contact with two kids, Melody, 7 and Epik, 5, due to an extended no-contact restraining order involving his estranged wife, Princess Love. The order stemmed from Ray J’s arrest last month after an incident in which he allegedly pointed a gun at Princess during a Thanksgiving livestream.  Ray J was released on $50,000 bail and has denied aiming a weapon at her. With Christmas and the New Year approaching, Ray J says the situation feels especially unfair. The Shade Room shared a video where “Wait A Minute” reacted emotionally when asked about missing time with his kids. “Man, I don’t even want to talk about it,” he said. “I’m missing my kids. I’m missing Christmas, my son’s birthday.” In addition to missing Christmas, he will also be unable to see Epik for his upcoming sixth birthday. The tension between the former couple spilled online during a livestream. Princess confronted her estranged husband in an emotional exchange. In a reaction video, she urged him to seek professional help. “Check yourself into rehab, because you’re more than drunk,” Princess said at the time. “Everything I do, I do for my kids.” Ray J and Princess Love announced their fourth attempt at divorce last year.

50 Cent has long occupied a place where music, business, and public persona intersect. However, a recent message suggested a quieter moment of reflection. On Good Friday, he posted a prayer to Instagram that blended humor with a request for grace. “Father God forgive me for my sins, forgive me for eating so much peanut butter and jelly, I’m big [as] sh!t now,” he wrote. He continued, “Father God forgive my enemies for misunderstanding me, allow your light to shine so bright with in me that my aura glows, in the name of the father the son and the Holy Spirit Amen. 50cent.” In a separate post, he added, “Positive vibes it’s Good Friday I’m gonna get some work done.” For an artist known as much for confrontation as for candor, the tone stood out. Over time, 50 Cent has built a reputation for engaging critics and rivals directly, often with pointed humor. That history has led some observers to question whether moments like this signal a meaningful shift. On the other hand, some believe these moments simply reflect another facet of his personality. Others view it as consistent with an artist who has always mixed sharp commentary with flashes of introspection. In all these stories, the presence of “50” remains unmistakable. Recent activity illustrates that balance. Not long ago, he commented on reports involving Jimmy Henchman and an alleged prison incident. Henchman denied the incident. Around the same time, he weighed in on headlines involving Pooh Shiesty and Gucci Mane. He responded in a way that quickly circulated online. “WTF going on here,” he wrote, later adding, “Damn it man [eyeballs emoji] I thought you was smoking on Pookie Loc. Stay tuned for the next episode of only in Atlanta!” Naturally, 50 was referenced as he reacted to the events. Legal Battles Continue as He Shows a Softer Side Online Away from social media, legal matters continue to unfold. He is currently involved in a dispute with his former partner, Shaniqua Tompkins, centered on claims raised in court filings. While he has not addressed those proceedings as openly online, filings indicate he is actively contesting the allegations. Even in court, the number 50 is closely associated with his public identity. For now, the Good Friday posts offer a brief departure from the tone that has often defined his public image. Whether they reflect a lasting shift or a passing moment remains uncertain. Regardless, they add another layer to a figure whose career has rarely followed a single narrative. All in all, 50 continues to be central as his story evolves.

Jay-Z is moving forward with his federal defamation suit against attorney Tony Buzbee. However, the case will now proceed in a different venue. The original complaint was filed in Alabama, where the plaintiff resides. However, the complaint faced a challenge from Buzbee. He argued the matter should be heard in New York, where the alleged events took place. In addition, he contended the Alabama court lacked proper jurisdiction over the dispute. On March 31, Judge Terry Moorer declined to dismiss the case. Instead, he transferred it to the Southern District of New York. From that point forward, all pending and future motions—including dismissal requests—will fall under the purview of a New York federal judge. As a result, the venue change also casts uncertainty over whether the accuser, who previously dropped the sexual assault claim with prejudice, can maintain anonymity. This will be decided as the litigation unfolds. Jay-Z’s Defamation Case Shifts to New York Court filings state, “In the interest of justice, by separate order, the case will be transferred to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.” They further clarify that unresolved motions, such as those seeking to proceed under a pseudonym, will be decided by the receiving court. As reported by The New York Times last year, Jay-Z filed his defamation suit against Doe, Buzbee, and attorney David Fortney following the dismissal of the sexual assault case. Additionally, the rapper alleges that Doe admitted fabricating her claims to gain financially. However, Buzbee maintains she stands by her allegations. Furthermore, he asserts that the suit is legally unfounded. The original allegations involved Doe accusing Jay-Z and Sean Combs of sexual abuse at an MTV Video Music Awards after-party in 2000, when she was 13. Her legal team ultimately withdrew the lawsuit without public comment. Jay-Z’s attorneys argue Buzbee “pushed” Doe to pursue the false claims. In 2024, Jay-Z initiated a separate defamation and extortion action against Buzbee in Los Angeles. This action was dismissed but remains under appeal. Thus, the legal saga is kept alive.

A legal dispute involving 50 Cent and his former partner Shaniqua Tompkins has moved forward in a New York court. Both sides are contesting the scope and relevance of claims tied to a years-old agreement. In a sworn filing, the rapper argued that allegations included in Tompkins’s court papers are unrelated to the central contract dispute involving G-Unit Books. He asked the court to seal portions of the record. He maintains that the claims risk unnecessary damage to his reputation. “Tompkins…seeks to inject inflammatory and defamatory allegations concerning me personally into this litigation. The allegations concern purported events from decades ago that are wholly irrelevant to the issues,” 50 Cent wrote. The filing casts the matter primarily as a disagreement over contractual obligations rather than a broader personal conflict. Notably, the dispute centers on agreements involving 50 and his business interests. In the same submission, he warned of the potential consequences if the material becomes part of the public record. “If Tompkins’ inflammatory and defamatory allegations in her pleadings are permitted to enter the public record without restriction, the resulting harm to my personal and professional reputation will be immediate, severe, and irreversible.” The lawsuit itself stems from claims by G-Unit Books that Tompkins violated an exclusive life-rights agreement signed in 2007. The dispute intensified after she spoke publicly about their past relationship in interviews and on social media. There, she described allegations of abuse during her pregnancy. Those statements have since become intertwined with the ongoing legal arguments regarding 50’s contractual rights. Duress Claim Keeps $1M Legal Fight Alive Tompkins has challenged the validity of the agreement, saying she signed it under pressure. “Fearing for my life and for my children’s lives, I signed the agreement under extreme duress,” she alleged back in January. Jackson’s legal position holds that acknowledging the contract complicates her claim and shifts attention back to whether its terms were breached. The case continues after a judge declined to grant a default judgment in his favor. G-Unit Books is seeking $1 million in damages as the proceedings move ahead. In fact, 50 is still actively involved in the ongoing legal battle.

Shyne has publicly responded to Brandy’s denial that they were ever romantically involved, telling TMZ that her version of events is inaccurate. The story resurfaced after Shyne and Ma$e discussed dating Brandy around the same period during an episode of the podcast It Is What It Is. Brandy swiftly issued a statement refuting the claims. She described their connection as strictly platonic. Shyne defended his account. He emphasized that his recollections come from admiration. “I spoke from a place of admiration and a place of reminiscing on my experience with her, which I didn’t care to highlight the negatives, it was only positive,” he said. “I don’t know what is wrong with her.” He also noted a past incident in which Brandy apologized on Oprah after misrepresenting her marital status to protect her public image. “She lied to Oprah about being married and had to go on Oprah and apologize because she said she did that to protect her image… I can’t get in her mind. I’m just saying that she has lied to the public before to protect her image, and maybe the fact that she was seeing both Mase and I at the same time, she feels it’s not good for her image.” View this post on Instagram Shyne and Ma$e Recall the Past, While Brandy Sets the Record Straight Reflecting on their differing perspectives, Shyne contrasted his approach with Ma$e’s: “Mase has different opinions. He’s very hard-lined. He’s very extreme. I’m a bit more compassionate, a bit middle ground. So, Mase and I weren’t agreeing on everything. But we agreed on [both dating her]. So, if I was capping, he would have said, ‘Nah, Shyne. I don’t remember it like that.’ He and I remember it the same way. Clark Kent remembers it the same way. So, but you know what? Happy Women’s Month.” The discussion began after fellow rapper Cam’ron prompted Shyne and Ma$e to clarify overlapping timelines with Brandy on the podcast. Brandy later took to Instagram to address the situation directly. She wrote: “In the late 90’s, I had a platonic friendship with rapper Shyne. In an unfortunate turn of events, that friendship is now being mischaracterized as ‘we dated.’ Unequivocally, we did not! I’m not sure why an untrue narrative about a scope of what was a friendship more than 20-years ago is being reshaped during his current media interviews.”

Jay-Z is gearing up to celebrate two of his most iconic albums with back-to-back performances at Yankee Stadium this summer. The rapper will honor the 30th anniversary of Reasonable Doubt on July 10, followed by a July 11 show commemorating the 25th anniversary of The Blueprint. The announcement comes after months of speculation that Jay-Z was planning milestone events tied to these albums. Just yesterday, he was confirmed as a headliner for the Roots Picnic on May 30, marking his first major solo stage appearance since joining Beyoncé on the final stop of her international “Cowboy Carter” tour in Paris. The 2026 Roots Picnic, running May 30-31, will feature Jay-Z performing alongside the Roots, their first collaboration on stage in over a decade. In the lead-up to these celebrations, Jay-Z has made subtle nods to the anniversaries, including rebranding his name as JAŸ-Z on streaming services—a nod to the stylization used on Reasonable Doubt. He also re-released the original Dead Presidents track and unveiled the video for “Wishing on a Star,” featuring Gwen Dickey, on YouTube, reinforcing the nostalgic rollout for fans. View this post on Instagram Jay-Z Celebrates Legacy, No New Album Yet Amid the festivities, speculation about new music has swirled, fueled by hints from collaborators in recent interviews. Rapper Cash Cobain later clarified his earlier claim, noting that Jay-Z told him he is “absolutely not dropping an album” anytime soon. For now, the focus remains on these landmark performances, offering audiences a chance to revisit the music that shaped Jay-Z’s career and solidified his legacy in hip-hop.

Boosie recently offered $1,000 to anyone who could identify a phone number repeatedly contacting Child Protective Services about him and his fiancée, Rajel. On Instagram Live, the Louisiana rapper sought help urgently, posting the number and explaining the situation. “If anybody know this number that I just posted on Instagram, I need you to call me at the number that I got on the caption so I can figure this out,” he said. “This number keep calling Child Protective Services on me. So I’m trying to get to the bottom of this, find out who this is. Child Protective came to me right here at the house. And I’m trying to find out who this is ASAP. If you know this number, this number in your phone, I got a thousand dollars for you. All right.” Boosie moved quickly, tracing the number to a woman’s CashApp account, whom he suspects of filing false reports to disrupt his life. “I found out already, tied her to her CashApp. Ya done. Ya done. And she’s a Boosie stalker. I’m all over her page. This is what people do, you crazy b####,” he said. He made clear that these calls were serious, noting that the harassment added to a period already marked by tension and stress. Gunfire Erupts at Akron Show; Fans Injured as Boosie Takes Cover The rapper’s troubles escalated last week when gunfire erupted during his performance at Akron, Ohio’s Field House Lounge. Mid-set, shots rang out, injuring three attendees. Police said the shooter bypassed security and became involved in a confrontation in the crowd. Boosie ducked for cover as fans fled, while the suspect escaped on foot. Authorities confirmed that Boosie was not the intended target, but the incident served as a stark reminder of the persistent violence shadowing his events. Akron police continue to investigate the shooting and are reviewing surveillance footage to identify the assailant. Meanwhile, no updates have emerged regarding potential legal action against the alleged stalker responsible for the CPS calls, leaving questions about accountability unresolved.

Will Smith and Chris Rock are quietly exploring the possibility of sitting down together for a televised conversation with ABC News, according to people familiar with the discussions. If it comes together, the interview would be their first shared public appearance since the confrontation at the Academy Awards that unsettled Hollywood and rippled far beyond it. Representatives for both men have declined to comment, and the network has not announced details. Still, the prospect of seeing them across from each other again has stirred immediate interest. The 2022 Oscars broadcast veered off script when Smith walked onto the stage and struck Rock after a joke about Jada Pinkett Smith. The moment landed with a thud inside the Dolby Theatre and traveled instantly across television screens and smartphones. Not long after, Smith returned to his seat and later accepted the Academy Award for Best Actor for “King Richard,” delivering remarks that competed with the shock still hanging in the room. View this post on Instagram A First Direct Conversation Since the Oscars Incident In the hours and days that followed, Smith issued a public apology to Rock and the Academy, describing his actions as “unacceptable and inexcusable.” The Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences subsequently barred him from its events for 10 years. Rock addressed the episode sparingly during stand-up performances, including a 2023 Netflix special, where he offered his perspective without speaking directly to Smith. A joint interview, if finalized, would offer something neither man has yet attempted: a direct exchange in real time. It could provide clarity about how they have processed a moment that became cultural shorthand for the volatility of live television. ABC News has not announced an air date.

A civil lawsuit connected to the 2022 shooting outside The Nice Guy in West Hollywood has been withdrawn, bringing a close to claims against the rapper Kodak Black. The incident occurred during Super Bowl Weekend, when he was leaving a private event hosted by Justin Bieber. Two men, Mark Schaefer and Adam Rahman, had alleged that Black’s actions contributed to a confrontation that escalated into gunfire. Court filings indicate the plaintiffs have now dropped the case involving Kodak. Bradford Cohen, an attorney for Kodak Black, criticized the lawsuit in pointed terms. “This lawsuit filed by Gloria Allred, might have been the dumbest, most ridiculous lawsuit I have ever read,” he said, adding that his client chose not to seek attorney’s fees. Cohen said that decision allowed the plaintiffs to leave “with their tail between their legs.” Furthermore, he cautioned lawyers against pursuing what he characterized as unfounded claims about Kodak. View this post on Instagram From $62M to Zero Justin Bieber was initially named in the suit but was dismissed months later. The plaintiffs first sought $62 million in damages, a request that was rejected by a judge. They then made an unsuccessful attempt to recover $10.6 million, just as the civil suit against Kodak ended with no reward. The shooting took place outside the venue as guests, including several prominent artists, were arriving or departing. Kodak Black was struck in the leg. Schaefer was wounded near his ankle, and Rahman in the shoulder. In earlier court documents, Rahman alleged that “Kodak Black initiated the altercation with patrons outside of the subject location, which was the catalyst for the series of events that led to gun violence.” This made Kodak a central figure in the investigation.

Floyd Mayweather must have been listening to LL COOL J when he rapped, “Don’t Call id comeback/I been here for eats.” In a stunning announcement, just before his 49th birthday, Mayweather is officially returning to boxing. On Friday evening, the 15-time world champion confirmed that he is “unretiring” following his highly anticipated exhibition bout with Mike Tyson.  “I still have what it takes to set more records in the sport of boxing,” Mayweather told Andreas Hale of ESPN. “From my upcoming Mike Tyson event to my next professional fight afterwards — no one will generate a bigger gate, have a larger global broadcast audience, and generate more money with each event — then my events. And I plan to keep doing it with my global media partner, CSI Sports/FIGHT SPORTS.” Floyd Mayweather Jr. has announced that he will end his retirement and resume his professional boxing career after his Spring 2026 boxing exhibition with Mike Tyson. “I still have what it takes to set more records in the sport of boxing,” Mayweather said in a statement to ESPN.… — ESPN (@espn) February 20, 2026 Richard and Craig Miele, co-founders of CSI Sports/Fight Sports, also released a statement expressing their excitement about partnering with Mayweather. “Signing Floyd Mayweather to un-retire after he captures another worldwide audience with his Mike Tyson match-up, highlights our commitment to providing our global audience with the most high-profile fighters in the sport,” the statement read. “Floyd will once again continue to dominate boxing with the biggest audience and highest gross events of all time, and we are proud and privileged to be able to do with our global team at CSI Sports/FIGHT SPORTS,” their joint statement read. “We look forward to even more announcements that will excite fans and continue to build the sport in 2026!’ MAYWEATHER IS ONE OF BOXING’S ALL-TIME GREATS In a professional career spanning from 1996 to 2017, Mayweather amassed a flawless record of 50-0, and he’s hailed as one of the greatest fighters in the history of the sport. Mayweather has won 15 major world titles across five different weight classes, from super featherweight to light middleweight.  A game-changer when it comes to the economics of boxing, he was named the highest-paid athlete of the last decade(2010–2019) by Forbes and headlined the two highest-grossing pay-per-view events against Manny Pacquiao and Conor McGregor.  MAYWEATHER IS SUING SHOWTIME Mayweather’s decision to return to officially return to the squared circle follows a recent lawsuit he filed against Showtime. In the suit, he claims that the network, along with former president Stephen Espinoza, misappropriated his funds. He’s seeking $340 million in damages.